the tabu against questioning the Holocaust

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

larrysmusings

Why can there be subjects of historical inquiry that are off limits?

It is currently illegal in many European nations to question the official or generally accepted account of the holocaust of European Jewry during the Second World War.  This is no distortion nor exaggeration.  European readers are well aware of these restrictions.

Our purpose here is not to dissect the official holocaust story, but rather to question the possible reasons or motivations for restricting objective and open inquiry into the official history of the holocaust, and stifling open discussions of the results of such inquiries that are made.

View original post 2,221 more words

3 thoughts on “the tabu against questioning the Holocaust

  1. At NoFakeNews we have a mission statement that is centered on bringing a clearer picture of the world and its history to our readers. No subject is off limits.

    If the truth can set you free, the absence of truth can enslave us and promote ignorance. This option should never be tolerated or accepted by society.

  2. If it’s against the law to question something, the law is obviously being used to protect that particular something.

    I will cite an unrelated subject to drive home my point. In the United States, pharmaceutical companies can’t be sued for damages above a few hundred thousand dollars for vaccine accidents. In other words if the vaccines they manufacture harm human beings, the victims are only able to sue for damages in a special vaccine court where the monetary awards are few and far apart.

    This is a law that protects something that is apparently quite dangerous to people.

    The holocaust denial laws are absolutely absurd and only exist to protect a paradigm that the powers that be want protected.

    Remember that history is written by the victors and not by the victims. The victors profit not only during the battles of war but for many years later. They have a vested interest in the way historical records are written and perceived by the masses. They surely don’t want revisions to the historical records that could ultimately change the paradigm and make a profitable situation less profitable.

    1. Excellent insights, Gina. We need to bring history into accord with the facts – that is what revisionists attempt to do.

      As to vaccines, yes, these are quite dangerous. The babies and small infants are being given too many of these, too close together (many on the same day) and at too early an age.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s