Are Heartworms and Big Pharma Squeezing the Life Out of Your Wallet?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

If you’re like most canine owners, you probably love your dogs very much and want these family members to be as healthy as possible. Pet adoption is a serious responsibility and quite often the bond between an animal and human can last for a very long time.

Being a dog owner, I can certainly identify with the many responsibilities associated with caring for pets. And over the years, I’ve had to bring my dogs to the vet for a number of reasons. In an emergency situation, a good veterinarian can mean the difference between an animal surviving and dying. But the same animal, health care specialists that can save your pet’s life, in an emergency scenario, can potentially decrease their overall level of health while trying to prevent them from acquiring diseases and parasitic infections.

I believe that many people fail to realize dogs, and other animals, have natural defenses against diseases, parasites, and a whole host of other biological opportunists they regularly come into contact with. If you listen to the marketing strategies of Big Pharma, and the companies that peddle their related products/services, you might think your beloved canine would instantly drop dead without being regularly immunized and safeguarded with monthly heartworm medicines.

The truth be told, all animals, including your pet, have naturally functioning immune systems that protect them against diseases and parasites. In spite of what you might have heard, read or viewed, through the mediums of radio, television, and print media, many commonly accepted animal health practices, that attempt to prevent diseases, could be weakening your pet’s natural immune system.

According to Dr. Jeffrey Levy, a veterinarian out of Williamsburg, Massachusetts, a lot of unnecessary fear and anxiety have been placed into the psyche of dog caretakers. Dr. Levy writes, “…allopathic attitudes have instilled in many of us a fear of disease, fear of pathogens and parasites, fear of rabies, as if these are evil and malicious entities just waiting to lay waste to a naive and unprotected public…” While Dr. Levy believes that in certain situations drugs might be justifiable concerning heartworms, he personally embraces a more holistic strategy when caring for his own pet. On his website he writes, “For what it’s worth, I never gave my dog any type of heartworm preventive, even when we lived in the Santa Cruz area where heartworms were very prevalent. I tested him yearly, and he never had a problem.”

Just as they do with human beings, pharmaceutical companies make billions of dollars manufacturing and distributing extremely toxic poisons for domesticated animals. The toxic vaccines and monthly heartworm preventive products actually weaken your pet’s immune system over time and make them more susceptible to diseases and parasites that exist within their natural environment.

While Big Pharma would like you to believe that heartworms are waiting around every corner to squeeze the life out of your dog’s heart, the reality of the situation is that this is not true. What’s actually being squeezed is the pet owner’s wallet. And it’s absolutely unnecessary. Some very knowledgeable people  have gone on record, over the years, stating that the heartworm scam is a billion dollar industry.

As always, when Big Pharma has its “paws” in the game, the health and best interests of patients are not a top priority. This applies to human beings as well as man’s best friend.

One has to seriously wonder how animals that live in the wild can continue to survive so well despite being constantly exposed to natural parasites and opportunistic pathogens. And remember, they don’t have access to vaccines and monthly preventive pharmaceutical products.

What do you think about this subject?

 

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

NASA Scientists: Organics (Life) Found on Mars!

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In 1976 NASA sent an unmanned spacecraft, named Viking, to search for extraterrestrial life on the planet Mars. According to the space agency, the craft’s robotic arm scooped a sample of the Martian soil, tested the materials in an on-board laboratory, and found no signs of life on the foreign world.

For over three decades, American citizens were told by our space agency that there was no life on Mars. And now, just like that, NASA scientists have suddenly changed their minds. The lab results of the soil samples have been reassessed and the new results demonstrate that “organics” were present on Mars in 1976. The new consensus of scientific opinion is that Viking did find evidence of microbial life on the planet’s surface.

Why is the mainstream media re-releasing this story to the world in the middle of April, 2012? The new study that determined “organics” were present on the red planet was first announced in an article that was published by Discovery News on January 4, 2011. Why are the fake news agencies pushing old news from 2011 as if it was just released a few hours ago?

Is this an attempt by “the powers that be” to prepare the masses for an upcoming announcement that intelligent life exists on Mars? Is the secret finally being let out of the bag?

With the introduction of undeniable evidence by researchers, Norman Bryden (Marsstructures.com) and Joseph Skipper (marsanomalyresearch.com) it’s getting harder for NASA to maintain its ridiculous position that Mars is a dead and barren world. Bryden and Skipper have located buildings, towers, foliage, waterways, and civilization evidence on the Martian surface, and they’ve done so using NASA’s photographs.

What else could NASA possibly do? They’ve put themselves in an extremely awkward situation by covering up, for so many years, the fact that Mars is apparenly littered with intelligent life. Enter their latest piece of spin news; a story that claims scientists have reevaluated a three decade old lab experiment and the new results demonstrate microbial life is present on Mars.

Many citizens will applaud the new Mars study while a large segment of the population will cling to primitive belief systems that preclude followers from entertaining ideas about the existence of life off world.

In the end, NASA was able to maneuver itself into a much better position than it had been in prior to the “life on Mars announcement.” The space agency has gotten away with hiding important information from the country and the general population could care less.

What do you think about this developing story?

New Study Says Obesity Causes Autism?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

According to a new, scientific study that was published on April 9, 2012 by the Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, there is a definite link between overweight mothers and babies that are born with autism.

The results of the study were featured in an article that was published by the online magazine, Natural Society, on April 10, 2012. The author of the article, Anthony Gucciardi writes, “New research has drawn a direct link between obese mothers and autistic babies, finding that overweight pregnant women have a startling 67% higher chance of having an autistic child than those who are not.”

In 1998, a scientific study authored by Andrew Wakefield, M.D. was published by The Lancet that supposedly demonstrated a direct link between autism and the MMR vaccine. The study was later retracted by the journal in 2010; because it was determined that Dr. Wakefield had disregarded several scientific, research standards while completing his work. Many alternative health care practitioners believe the Wakefield study was not flawed and that it accurately reflected the true cause of autism.

To this day, there continues to be an ongoing debate over whether vaccines are a causal factor in the genesis of so many cases of autism in the United States and around the world.

Conventional, allopathic medicine is quick to offer a variety of reasons for the tremendous increase in autism cases nationally. None of the reasons, however, seem to be linked to the medical profession’s regular practice of vaccinating the world’s children with medicines that have a longstanding history of containing toxic ingredients including Mercury.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has a documented history of supporting the vaccine agenda. They regularly encourage pediatricians to coerce parents into vaccinating their children. They also provide a publication that teaches pediatricians how to profit, in a business sense, from administering toxic vaccines to young children.

One has to seriously question the objectivity and credibility of a study that was published and promoted by an organization that has such a long, documented history of being a strong proponent of vaccinating children.

Are we being lied to? Are we being fed a study that has been engineered to purposely confuse the public about the true cause of autism?  What do you think about this controversial, scientific study?

Click here to listen to Dr. John Reizer speak about the subjects of vaccines and autism on the nationally syndicated Dani Johnson Talk Radio Show that aired live on 4/11/12.