cancerous tumors

The Interview

The diner was nearly empty. It was late in the evening, and a waitress poured some coffee into two mugs and then walked away.

REPORTER: You said you have evidence that the medical establishment has misunderstood cancer for decades.

DR. DANIEL: I said I have a theory. There’s a difference.

REPORTER: What’s the theory?

DR. DANIEL: What if a tumor isn’t the enemy? What if it’s the body’s response to the enemy?

REPORTER: You mean the tumor itself?

DR. DANIEL: Yes. Think about what happens when cells stop behaving normally. They stop responding to the signals that tell them when to stop growing and how to stay connected to the surrounding tissue.

REPORTER: You’re talking about contact inhibition?

DR. DANIEL: Exactly. When cells lose that normal control, the body recognizes that something is wrong. My theory is that the immune system tries to contain those abnormal cells. It builds a wall around them.

REPORTER: And that wall is the tumor?

DR. DANIEL: That’s what I believe.

REPORTER: Most cancer doctors would disagree with you.

DR. DANIEL: I know, that’s why I’m sitting in a diner instead of speaking at a medical conference.

REPORTER: So where does the conspiracy come in?

Dr. Daniel looks toward the window before answering.

DR. DANIEL: The conspiracy begins after the tumor forms.

REPORTER: Are you talking about the biopsy?

DR. DANIEL: Think about it. The needle goes into the tumor, and the tissue is removed. The barrier is disturbed.

REPORTER: You’re saying that can spread the cancer?

DR. DANIEL: I’m saying that’s the question nobody ever wants to ask.

REPORTER: But biopsies are routinely performed because doctors need to determine what they’re dealing with.

DR. DANIEL: That’s what we’re told.

REPORTER: And what do you think?

DR. DANIEL: I think we may be breaking into the very structure the body created to contain the disease.

REPORTER: Earlier on the phone, you mentioned breast cancer specifically.

DR. DANIEL: Breast tissue is soft and highly connected. Now imagine a tumor sitting there, surrounded by tissue that’s trying to contain it. Then, someone applies pressure or inserts a needle.

REPORTER: And the cancer cells escape?

DR. DANIEL: That’s my concern.

REPORTER: But you don’t have proof that routine mammograms or biopsies cause systemic cancer.

DR. DANIEL: Not any proof that would survive a hearing conducted by the same people who profit from the current system.

REPORTER: Now we’re getting to your real accusation.

DR. DANIEL: Big Pharma makes billions of dollars treating cancer. Chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery generate enormous profits. Then there are drugs for the side effects of those procedures, and then more drugs.

REPORTER: You’re saying the industry wants cancer to continue?

DR. DANIEL: I’m saying there’s a financial incentive for cancer to remain a disease that requires years of treatment.

REPORTER: That’s a serious accusation.

DR. DANIEL: I’m well aware of that.

REPORTER: What happens after the tumor is disturbed?

DR. DANIEL: In my theory, cancer cells that were contained can enter the circulation and travel elsewhere.

REPORTER: And then chemotherapy and radiation are used.

DR. DANIEL: Yes, of course.

REPORTER: Which you believe makes things worse?

DR. DANIEL: I believe we may be attacking the patient’s ability to fight the disease at the same time we’re trying to kill the disease.

REPORTER: Because chemotherapy and radiation can damage healthy cells and affect the immune system.

DR. DANIEL: Exactly.

REPORTER: But cancer treatment is not simply designed to destroy the immune system.

DR. DANIEL: I didn’t say it was.

REPORTER: Then what are you saying?

DR. DANIEL: I’m saying we’ve built an entire system around attacking the tumor. Maybe we’ve never stopped to ask why the body created the tumor in the first place.

The waitress returns and places a slice of cake between them.

WAITRESS: Anything else?

REPORTER: No, thanks.

She walks away.

REPORTER: Doctor, if you’re right, you’re saying the entire model of cancer treatment is wrong.

DR. DANIEL: I’m saying we should be willing to question it.

REPORTER: And if you’re wrong?

DR. DANIEL: Let them prove me wrong.

REPORTER: That’s not how medicine works.

DR. DANIEL: Maybe that’s the real problem.

The reporter turns off the recorder.

REPORTER: One last question. Why come forward now?

Dr. Daniel looks at the clock above the counter.

DR. DANIEL: Because I spent many years treating patients the wrong way!

REPORTER: And?

DR. DANIEL: And eventually, I started asking questions I wasn’t supposed to ask.

He stands, leaves a few dollars beside his coffee, and walks toward the door.

REPORTER: Doctor.

Daniel stops.

REPORTER: What happens if the public finds out?

He looks back.

DR. DANIEL: Then somebody is going to have a lot of explaining to do.

The bell above the diner door rings as he walks into the night.

Have you watched the Target List movie?

The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

Target List (2023)

After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.

Read Our Latest Movie Review!

Watch the Movie Trailer

Watch Target List Today!

Click on the posters below to watch Target List

Our Latest Movie Journalist’s Review

“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”

-Indie Clips Magazine – June 2026

Dr. John Reizer

Any serious student of human physiology can comprehend and appreciate the illogicality of conventional cancer treatments. The facts demonstrate that the average healthcare consumer is being sold a false bill of goods about the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiation in treating cancers. The truth is that modern medicine has failed miserably in its attempts to conquer most forms of chronic illness.

Chemotherapy and radiation used to treat malignant tumors are about as successful in curing people of cancer as the chore of pulling the heads from dandelions is in attempting to eradicate the durable weeds from lawns. The weed infestation will not be resolved, and similarly, the tumors will reappear in human bodies in increased numbers and resiliency.

Big pharma medical research that leads to creating and implementing chronic disease mitigation protocols realm-wide focuses on pulling the heads from dandelions instead of getting to the root of specific problems. Written simply, there are far more profits for drug companies when they manufacture treatments that focus on managing the symptoms of diseases versus providing solutions that eliminate one or more aberrant expressions of human physiology.

If we administer chemotherapy and radiation to healthy people, they will become sick and die. How can we expect sick people to get better when administering the same toxins?

According to the oncology expert in the 2012 video below, only 3 percent of all cancer patients respond positively to radiation and traditional chemotherapy drugs. Many patients only extend their lives by a few months or less. Yet despite the miserable success rates returned, radiation and chemotherapy treatments are considered the gold standard within oncology and dealing with many other chronic diseases (intellectual properties).

While malignant tumors will often shrink after patients are administered chemotherapy and radiation (a standard measuring stick used by big medicine to rate the success or lack thereof concerning a particular treatment regimen), shrinkage of the tumors is mostly a result of the treatments killing noncancerous cells within the parameters of the cancer mass.

Malignant tumors are comprised of both cancerous and noncancerous stem cells. Inside those masses, ninety-nine percent of the cells are noncancerous, and only one percent are cancerous stem cells.

Chemotherapy and radiation only destroy the noncancerous cells in the tumors while leaving the cancerous stem cells intact and, for lack of a better word, ANGRY!

The bulk or mass of a tumor often decreases in size after chemotherapy and radiation sessions, but this in no way represents or signals the disease is cured.

A few years after completing the treatments, the cancers return in the patients at new locations and with greater resistance to additional mitigation procedures. In other words, it’s game over!

Disclaimer

The health information written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist, nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make healthcare decisions based on their independent research!