New York Times: Up to 90% of Positive Covid-19 Tests Should Have been Negative?

Dr. John Reizer

According to the video below, a New York Times article has reported that up to 90 percent of Covid-19 positive test results in multiple states should have been negative. The rationale for the report is that the PCR tests that are being used in the United States and worldwide to diagnose the virus in human beings are using amplification techniques that yield false-positive results in people that have trace amounts of the coronavirus in their bodies.

WATCH THE VIDEO AND THEN READ BELOW WHY IT IS DISINFORMATION 

Now, let me give you the truth about the video while breaking down the “bombshell” report into simple English:

THE VIDEO ABOVE IS DISINFORMATION!

  1. PCR tests are totally useless in diagnosing Covid-19 because the virus doesn’t exist.
  2. The PCR tests are registering false-positive results when encountering trace amounts of genetic materials that are common in 20-40 percent of the population.
  3. The genetic materials triggering false-positive results have nothing to do with the coronavirus. The test kits were purposely designed and calibrated to identify the said genetic materials by the architects of the fake pandemic ahead of time.
  4. The genetic signature that has been built into the test kits and is used to search for matching signatures in test subjects is not the isolated COVID-19 virus.
  5. The COVID-19 virus has never been appropriately isolated using Koch’s postulates and, therefore, cannot be claimed to have been isolated through the rigors of scientific study.
  6. The genetic material that is being used as “the answer key” in the test kits and claimed to be the isolated coronavirus commonly found in 20-40 percent of the human population is not COVID-19. It is harmless genetic debris that probably resulted from prior immunization damage to body cells.
  7. The video above will not be censored or taken down because it was designed to make people believe that the virus is real. COVID-19 is not an actual virus!
  8. The fact that the New York Times published the report is a dead giveaway that this information is part of the psyop. The other thing that lets us know the story is part of the agenda is the fact that the video is still accessible. It’s not just dumb luck that the video is still streaming. I can assure you the controlling powers did not forget to censor the production. It’s still live because the powers that be want it up and running.
  9. As long as people believe that an actual virus exists, there remains a need for medical mitigation and a vaccine. As soon as it is proven that the virus is a hoax, there no longer exists a requirement for medical mitigation or a vaccine.

STOP THE COVID-19  HOAX INSANITY: DOWNLOAD A FREE COPY OF DR. REIZER’S PLANDEMIC NOVELLA ON AMAZON.COM. OFFER ENDS MIDNIGHT  PACIFIC TIME  ON SEPTEMBER 7TH. TELL OTHERS AND SHARE THE INFORMATION BROADLY!

GET FREE BOOK HERE!

9 thoughts on “New York Times: Up to 90% of Positive Covid-19 Tests Should Have been Negative?

  1. NoFakeNews September 6, 2020 / 4:51 pm

    Thanks for sharing, Bill.

    Dr. Reizer

  2. NoFakeNews September 5, 2020 / 10:26 pm

    Thanks for sharing, Tim! 🙂
    Dr. Reizer

  3. NoFakeNews September 5, 2020 / 10:25 pm

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
    Dr. Reizer

  4. NoFakeNews September 5, 2020 / 10:22 pm

    Thank you, Pam! 🙂

    Dr. Reizer

  5. didiusjulianus September 5, 2020 / 6:36 pm

    Unfortunately, the majority of people are or will be living under a great delusion and fall away from any chance at seeing truth. We need to, if not having done so already, to take steps to be prepared physically, mentally and spiritually for the onslaught to come.

  6. tim September 5, 2020 / 3:27 pm

    Okay, so we know the virus is not real, so fake news producing more fake news.

    Anyway, I was wondering, the Pres, says they will have a vaccine out by end of this year, after it comes out, and millions will take it voluntarily, then of course, the big rush of 1000’s if not millions get sick with something ? probably blame the cv19, how can no one get the connection ?

    How can anyone see the rush of millions of vaccines, followed by a rush of a “sickness” throughout the world, and no one is going to get the connection ?

    The fake news will tell the sheeple it’s a cv19 virus, that’s come back even stronger, or something else, and they will all buy it ? Please tell me it isn’t so … Please tell me the people will get the connection ?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.