NASA

Public Domain Photos of the Moon and Mars: A Large Collection of Obfuscated Images

NoFakeNews1 Comment

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

Since my early childhood, I have always wondered why we (the U.S. Space Agency) went to the moon, in the late 60’s and early 70’s, and then abruptly pulled the plug on the Apollo program as well as any other campaigns that might have been planned to explore our nearest celestial neighbor.

The moon, without a doubt, is the most logical target for NASA to have its cross-hairs focused on. Completely within its reach, one would think our space agency would be overly ambitious to return to the lunar surface. The 6 manned, space missions to the moon the United States managed to pull off 40 years ago should have only scratched the surface of scientific curiosity. I am not exaggerating when I write that there are many scientists today that would love to have an opportunity to explore the moon’s surface. Let’s face facts, our satellite is an extraordinary object, and it’s strategically positioned to offer the best seat in the universe when it comes to keeping an eye on planet earth. For that reason alone, our military leaders are undoubtedly champing at the bit to have access to this lunar lookout.

Why, then, did we abandon all future plans to return to the moon? Some of the answers that have been offered by NASA are, “It’s too expensive” and “We’ve been there and accomplished that. The moon is a dead, rocky,  barren world and we don’t need to go back.” Those responses are almost laughable. When was the last time the U.S. government ever worried about spending too much money? For God’s sake, they print money, out of thin air, and bail out banks that are too big to fail like some people change their underwear. Besides the financial considerations, when was the last time our government invaded a strategic territory and then decided to withdraw from that location at a later date? The answer is never.

The truth about NASA and the U.S. government is that they have never lost their desire to return to the moon. We spent money sending the Clementine spacecraft there in 1994. The Clementine mission was designed to thoroughly photograph every nook and cranny of the lunar surface, and that it did. According to the government’s official website, “The mission results were spectacular.”

If our government really had no interest in returning to the “dead moon” then why did it bother to map the entire planetoid? When all those photos were being taken by Clementine, did the U.S. government see something so disturbing on our satellite that they made a decision to never return there again?

Researcher Joseph P. Skipper (www.marsanomalyresearch.com) has compiled numerous photos, courtesy of NASA and JPL, which clearly show both the moon and planet Mars have artificial structures (buildings) on their respective surfaces. According to Skipper, NASA has been obfuscating images of the lunar and Martian surfaces for many years. The catalogs of photographs on his website, made exclusively from property released into the public domain by NASA, show huge buildings on our moon. The catalogs also contain numerous photographs clearly showing large buildings, cityscapes, lakes, rivers, vegetation, civilization evidence, and fossil remains on Mars.

The questions I have are not centered on whether there’s life on the moon or Mars. I would like to know who is on our moon and what type of civilization resides on Mars.

Recently, photos coming from Mars probes, that have been sent to photograph the Martian surface, have revealed pictures of what appear to be small mammals and lizards. There certainly seems to be a lot of strange things happening on both the moon and Mars. It would be wonderful, and a breath of fresh air, if we were one day permitted to view un-obfuscated photos of these foreign worlds that have been taken by our space agency. It should be mentioned that American taxpayers have funded all of these missions and the associated equipment that was used to create said photos in the first place.

It is one thing to make photos available in the public domain. It is quite another thing to make the photos available so that they accurately reflect what was captured at the locations where the pictures were taken. Enough already, NASA, with all the smudges, airbrushing, and computer generated obfuscation techniques you are creating.

What do you think about this subject?

The Apollo Space Program: Astronauts or Astronots?

NoFakeNews9 Comments

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

On July 20, 1969, NASA’s Lunar Module (Eagle) touched down on the surface of our moon and astronaut, Neil Armstrong took one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind. Television anchor, Walter Cronkite kept Americans informed of the latest mission developments as human beings, for the first time ever, walked on the surface of a celestial body other than Earth.

But did it really happen the way we’ve been led to believe? Does the photographic record of NASA’s Apollo Program represent the truth? Did men visit the lunar surface, scoop up moon rocks, and return to Earth with those trophies?

Authors Mary Bennett and David S. Percy, in their book “Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers” convincingly explain the theory that NASA faked the moon landings throughout the Apollo program because they didn’t want the public to see what was really happening on the lunar surface. They also contend that NASA had serious challenges with escaping the earth’s radiation belts and, to this day, still do. This particular obstacle has precluded manned, deep space missions from taking place and was the real reason the space shuttle missions were designed. According to Bennett and Percy, NASA’s been trying to solve the radiation problems for years during shuttle missions.

Bennett and Percy believe that the United States did manage to successfully send two astronauts to the moon that unfortunately died from radiation poisoning before completing the journey back to earth. That mission was performed in private while the faked Apollo missions were filmed in studios and later broadcast as if they were live television feeds coming from the moon. The authors say that even the people working at mission control believed the Apollo transmissions were coming from the moon. Only a few people knew the truth.

Some of the alternative theories that challenge NASA’s historical record have been addressed by the space agency. NASA officials claim that when the astronauts visited the moon, they left reflective mirrors near the landing sites and that scientists on earth have been bouncing lasers off those mirrors for 43 years.

Bennett and Percy argue that the reflective mirrors only prove that someone went to the moon. They don’t prove Apollo delivered the astronauts to the lunar surface.

In July, 2009, NASA released photographs of the supposed landing sites for each of the Apollo missions that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Critics, that have viewed the photos, claim the images could have been digitally edited. The photos, unfortunately, have poor resolution making it hard to view important details that would positively identify the remaining portions of the lunar module’s descent stage. Critics have also questioned why NASA, with its highly sophisticated cameras, hasn’t produced close-ups of the landing sites.

In 1994, NASA’s Clementine spacecraft photographed the entire surface of the moon and, in doing so, discovered what appeared to be large artificial buildings on the lunar surface. These photographs appeared to be obfuscated by sophisticated techniques but the artificial structures were still positively identified by Steve Skipper and published on his website, www.marsanomalyresearch.com.

After looking at the obfuscated lunar pictures from Clementine, it’s hard for some people to trust the integrity of the photos, offered by NASA, showing the Apollo landing sites.

It’s hard to imagine that a government agency might not have been completely transparent when discussing the Apollo program with its citizens. Of course many Americans don’t buy into any conspiracy theories whatsoever. To do so would be much too painful for them. Only NASA knows for sure what transpired 43 years ago. Was it, in fact, a giant leap for mankind or just a giant lie?

The Moon: A Dead Planetoid or a Thriving Base for Extraterrestrials?

NoFakeNews2 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

For a very long time, human beings have been taught that our moon, the celestial object we’re all so accustomed to seeing overhead, is a dead and barren world devoid of any life whatsoever. According to our space agency (NASA), the Apollo missions of the 60’s and 70’s confirmed that the lunar surface was littered with nothing but useless moon rocks and dust.

Ordinary citizens can’t visit the moon and commercial telescopes, sold in stores, aren’t strong enough to offer contrary visual evidence that would dispute the official claims of our trusted sources.

In 1994, the Clementine spacecraft was sent to the moon to photograph the entire lunar surface. This was a joint venture between the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (U.S. Navy) and NASA. The recorded photographs from that unmanned lunar mission were cataloged and made available as public domain documents. Those images can be accessed at the website, http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/.

The Clementine project proved to be an overwhelming success according to the Department of the Navy and NASA. The images were considered spectacular and helped the United States military have a much better understanding about many of the surface features of our only satellite.

On February 13, 2010, the military’s Clementine Lunar Browser (CLIB 1.5) was retired and replaced with a newer version (CLIB 2.0). The upgraded browser supposedly improved the viewing experience for people accessing the various images made available through the Clementine mission.

Under the original browser, a number of interesting lunar surface images were published on the Clementine website and they clearly demonstrated artificially constructed buildings and shapes. The photographs of these structures are undeniable. They were also obviously obfuscated (but not entirely) by someone that didn’t want the public to be made aware of such important evidence.

The newly updated (CLIB 2.0) software, that is active on the Clementine website, does not show any evidence of the previously visible artificial buildings and structures on the lunar surface. The new images have been thoroughly sanitized so that the public’s perception of the moon remains consistent with the false history of the planetoid we’ve been spoon-fed throughout our lives.

For those people that aren’t brainwashed and are capable of understanding the significance of the evidence originally presented via (CLIB 1.5), there’s no longer a need to question whether or not the moon is inhabited by intelligent beings. Instead, the question that needs to be answered is what or who resides on the lunar surface?

The fact that NASA has canceled or not planned any additional manned space missions to the moon, or to any other venue for that matter, speaks volumes about who might be occupying our moon. It’s obviously not human beings up there. But if it’s not human beings residing on the moon, then what type of alien civilization exists directly above us? Why has an alien civilization decided to build huge bases on our moon? Are they watching us? Are they studying our tendencies? How long have they been there and what are their intentions? Are these beings secretly involved with our planet, species, and governments? And, finally, is there anything we can do about it? Unfortunately, we’re going to have a very difficult time getting such questions answered.

The official sources that carefully control the release of space related information, science and other data are not permitted to acknowledge the existence of extraterrestrials on the moon or at any other celestial locations (Mars).

Everyday, average citizens are so consumed with earthly responsibilities that they’re not overly concerned with what’s happening on the moon. But maybe they should be concerned. Maybe we have been presented with such a false understanding of reality that when we are given a glimpse of the truth, it appears to us as science fiction. Perhaps, we can not recognize the truth?

What do you think?