In the 1960s, one could buy a helluva lot of things with $3,000. To buy the same merchandise today would cost around $90,000. Things haven’t gotten more expensive; our fiat currency, the dollar, has become less valuable due to inflationary pressures that are inherently tied to a currency system not backed by tangible assets, such as precious metals.
AI-GENERATED Image
Today, it costs over $4,000 to buy 1 ounce of gold, whereas in 1967, it cost only $35 to buy the same amount.
Gold hasn’t become more expensive; the US dollar has become less valuable because it is being printed in greater quantities without being backed by tangible assets.
At one time, our US currency was as good as gold. Today, it’s barely worth the paper it’s printed on, and not for much longer as we approach a digital currency system in the coming years that will render physical cash obsolete.
AI-GENERATED Image
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie
Target List (2023)
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
According to most official sources, the average data center being constructed is over 100,000 square feet, about the size of a large department store.
Officialdom tells us that America must suddenly build these ginormous facilities to increase its digital infrastructure, win the global AI race, and ignite economic growth for its citizens.
The entire New York Public Library contains about 55 million items, according to the online sources I accessed.
How much physical space do you think is actually needed to hold all of those items in the computer world? A department store? A 5,000-square-foot home? A two-car garage? A one-car garage? A bedroom? A walk-in closet? Would you believe the answer is a space that’s somewhere between the size of a suitcase and a shoebox?
If 55 million items of data can be held inside the parameters of a shoebox, why in the hell are the powers that be constructing so many large data centers?
Once again, the narrative makes no sense.
Interestingly, experimental data chips exist that use a DNA framework and can hold ten times as much data as the New York Public Library on a pinhead. I believe this technology is already in use and has been for our entire lives.
What we are told about data centers, AI, and so many other things in the public domain doesn’t seem logical to me. It seems as if AI was thrown out there to all of us beginning around 2023, and it’s been stuffed down our collective throats ever since.
I maintain my opinion that artificial intelligence isn’t what we’ve been taught or led to believe. I wholeheartedly believe it’s been around and used by the powers that be for hundreds of years and in previous civilizations.
I think AI has been introduced into our civilization at this time for several reasons, one being an excuse to build what are called data centers.
I don’t believe the official narratives. We’ve been told these huge data center structures are needed to power something (AI) that’s clearly been running for much longer than most of us can comprehend.
Thanks for reading and sharing!
The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again
What if everything we have been taught about history is wrong? What if something beyond the parameters of human comprehension intentionally obfuscates our collective perception of reality?
We Need More People to Do Research!
Our book is written for the red pillers — those folks already awake. The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again is an essential starting point for readers who can then do more extensive boots-on-the-ground research after reading our work.
Unlike most other Old-World books, ours delves into a unique theory that attempts to explain what our realm might represent to all life forms experiencing reality within a simulated construct that is far different from what we’ve all been led to believe.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
I was lying in bed, and all of a sudden, I began thinking about all those health screening procedures that general medical practitioners want their patients to keep getting. You know the ones I’m talking about: the same ones you see advertised on television and movie platforms that want you to screen your body for cancer before it’s too late.
By the way, the published percentage rates for successful cancer eradication via traditional chemotherapy and radiation regimens are very misleading, to say the least, in my opinion. What Big Pharma defines as a successful treatment and recovery outcome for a particular cancer diagnosis is probably far removed from what you and I would believe is a happy outcome. If dying a few years removed from chemo and radiation is thought to be a statistically good outcome, then I guess traditional cancer eradication treatments would be the way to go.
We all know that Big Pharma and Big Medicine are continually fishing for fresh blood, new patients that they can sign up for the multi-billion dollar chemotherapy cash cow that slowly and methodically drains healthcare consumers’ finances before the victims physically expire from the poisons the cancer treatment industry infuses into their bodies.
The drugs they label and call modern cancer treatments are brutal enough for the people who actually have cancer, but think about for a few moments how terrible it all is for the hundreds of thousands of patients being poisoned by chemotheraputics that don’t have the big “C”; the ones who were misdiagnosed by false positive diagnostic tests?
In my view, medical “sayence” isn’t as “sayintific” as the “sayentists” want us all to believe. And let me write one other thing about this misdiagnosis subject. If the cancer treaters are publicly admitting that hundreds of thousands of cancer diagnostic errors are occurring annually, I believe it’s a safe bet to assume that the numbers and percentages are much, much higher than currently being reported.
We, healthcare consumers, regularly watch and depend on mainstream news platforms for unbiased reporting about cancer and other chronic inflammatory diseases, the same news companies that are paid by drug corporations countless dollars annually to promote and advertise prescription drugs and other pharmacological products. Do we honestly believe it’s possible to get unbiased health reporting and news from these sources?
If all of this weren’t so terribly sad and the absolute truth, it would be comical, but no one’s laughing except for Big Pharma all the way to the bank!
Disclaimer
Any health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist, nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!
Sometimes fiction is not an escape from reality, but rather the only way to talk about it.
–John Reizer
Watch the Movie Trailer
Click on the posters below to watch Target List
Critical Reviews
“Rachel Alig is terrific as Donna while Justin Ray as Clyde also manages to impress. Combining witty commentary with a constant threat to life, script writers Palo and Reizer develop a narrative that is funny and charming while ensuring that none of the thrill and danger is lost in the process.”
– INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Drama, thrills, comedy and so much more: Directors Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo’s Target List has all the fixings of a great movie. Combining a fantastic cast with the witty writing of MJ Palo and John Reizer, whichever way you flip this film, it lands on its feet with feline agility.”
– INDY REVIEWS
“The script by Palo with John Reizer, for the most part, rides that perfect balance between its more dramatic moments and perfectly placed moments of humor that never distract. While they’re probably not going to get invited to any big pharma conventions anytime soon, Reizer and Palo have a point, and they make it beautifully.”
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”
– RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
Our Latest Movie Journalist’s Review
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
-Indie Clips Magazine – June 2026
Gareth Icke – Derby, England
“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!“
Whether or not people realize it, our history and our historical narratives have been falsified. Nearly everything you believe about the world you live in is predicated on lies.
Click on the image below to watch the movie
I believe our realm has hosted countless human civilizations of different sizes, proportions, and appearances. By tweaking or modifying our DNA, the powers that be can change the human, animal, and plant avatars that occupy our 3-D holographic simulated reality construct.
Every modern technology available in our civilization, including artificial intelligence, has likely existed in intelligent human civilizations that predated ours.
The civilization (ours) that we’ve been led to believe is thousands of years old was likely reset by a cataclysmic event within the last several hundred years. Many of the stone-constructed old-world buildings that litter our realm, including many in Washington, DC, were, in my opinion, designed and constructed by a technologically advanced human civilization that predated ours.
The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again
What if everything we have been taught about history is wrong? What if something beyond the parameters of human comprehension intentionally obfuscates our collective perception of reality?
We Need More People to Do Research!
Our book is written for the red pillers — those folks already awake. The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again is an essential starting point for readers who can then do more extensive boots-on-the-ground research after reading our work.
Unlike most other Old-World books, ours delves into a unique theory that attempts to explain what our realm might represent to all life forms experiencing reality within a simulated construct that is far different from what we’ve all been led to believe.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
My question for any US political candidate or elected official is: Do you pledge your allegiance and unending support to any foreign countries that are committing genocidal acts against other human beings, and if so, why?
Photo Credit: YouTube
It’s my belief and opinion that if you aren’t doing so, you can’t get elected to an American public office regardless of your publicly disclosed political party affiliation.
-Dr. Reizer
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie
Target List (2023)
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
Take our special color blindness test, designed to help people who aren’t color blind see the truth right in front of their eyes.
The Box-Cutter Zone
A Book by Mike Palecek
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie
Target List (2023)
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
Modern-day Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) can allegedly travel great distances and reach their targets in 25–30 minutes. These weapon delivery systems are reportedly capable of getting nuclear warheads to distant locations realm-wide.
An ICBM Launching from an Underground Silo
According to the official narrative, ICBMs travel at altitudes significantly above Low Earth Orbit (LEO), or above 1,200 miles. The highest altitude an ICBM can reach is 2800 miles above Earth.
The Typical Flightpath of a Modern-day ICBM
Photo Credit: Public Domain
Space.com published an article that discusses the routine testing of Minuteman III ICBMs by the US Space Force. The US Space Force stated, “These test launches demonstrate the readiness of U.S. nuclear forces and provide confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation’s nuclear deterrent.”
Space.com! Are you kidding me? This publication is an official magazine of the psyop architects. This source regularly publishes crap about NASA’s phony space missions.
I will point out that the space shuttle allegedly flew its missions at around 200 miles of altitude. Yet, by NASA’s admission, it had failed to get a single human being out of low Earth orbit since Apollo until Artemis II on April 1, 2026. And we already know the CGI and AI photography that were used to convince people of the authenticity of that bunch of fakery.
I don’t believe any Apollo or Artemis astronauts have ever surpassed altitudes extending above Low Earth Orbit. I also don’t think it is possible to get any uncrewed craft or launch payloads above LEO altitudes, and any referenced accomplishments are based on science fiction rather than reality.
In my private conversations with David Weiss (Flat Earth Dave), he told me point-blank about a NASA whistleblower he had access to, who stated that space travel is not possible at altitudes much higher than 70 miles.
According to the whistleblower, there’s an impenetrable barrier (a firmament) above Earth that the space agency and others have been trying to breach for decades, and no one has gotten through it.
Why would he lie? I don’t believe he would, as there’s nothing for him to gain by doing so. I have spoken with David by phone, and I can detect, through his voice, that he is genuine in his intent to reveal the truth about space travel missions.
Thousands of ICBMs tipped with nuclear warheads are said to exist in the world and stockpiled by several countries. The nukes can supposedly vaporize humanity in less than the time it takes to watch one half-hour television sitcom.
Keep in mind that the people who tell us that ICBMs can do all of the horrible things written above are the same people who tell us we have an actual space program and that American astronauts went to the Moon with Apollo in 1969.
I am not buying either of these science fiction psyops. How many ICBMs have ever been launched in modern-day warfare, and where is the proof that an ICBM was ever successfully tested, and more importantly, who was there to witness the top-secret tests?
The military members are the only witnesses present at these secret ICBM tests. Nobody else can verify the integrity of such tests or if they even took place. It sounds eerily similar to all the other rocketry activities and nuclear weapon tests reported over the years. We must believe it’s true because government sources tell us they have said capabilities.
How many times have we heard in the past several years regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war and the US-Iranian conflict that nuclear weapons were going to be used? How many atomic weapons threats have been publicized over many decades without anything ever happening?
And if these doomsday devices exist, do we still honestly believe that in 2026, the controllers of this realm would allow the elected morons of various sovereign territories to possess nuclear suitcases with the accompanying launch codes? Please tell me that people aren’t gullible enough to believe this nonsense.
One thing I look for in dealing with people or sources is a pattern of their behavior. Do they provide reliable or unreliable information? When examining the track records of NASA and military related sources, I concluded long ago that these are unreliable information outlets. I don’t believe any of the information they publicly provide. They regularly give out disinformative content to throw off others about many things.
In my opinion, an ingenious way to attempt to control others is to sell the illusion of having doomsday weapons. I believe that the nuclear weapons program, along with its delivery systems, are nothing more than fictional creations.
“Rachel Alig is terrific as Donna while Justin Ray as Clyde also manages to impress. Combining witty commentary with a constant threat to life, script writers Palo and Reizer develop a narrative that is funny and charming while ensuring that none of the thrill and danger is lost in the process.”
– INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Drama, thrills, comedy and so much more: Directors Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo’s Target List has all the fixings of a great movie. Combining a fantastic cast with the witty writing of MJ Palo and John Reizer, whichever way you flip this film, it lands on its feet with feline agility.”
– INDY REVIEWS
“The script by Palo with John Reizer, for the most part, rides that perfect balance between its more dramatic moments and perfectly placed moments of humor that never distract. While they’re probably not going to get invited to any big pharma conventions anytime soon, Reizer and Palo have a point, and they make it beautifully.”
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”
– RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
