By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In 1976 NASA sent an unmanned spacecraft, named Viking, to search for extraterrestrial life on the planet Mars. According to the space agency, the craft’s robotic arm scooped a sample of the Martian soil, tested the materials in an on-board laboratory, and found no signs of life on the foreign world.

For over three decades, American citizens were told by our space agency that there was no life on Mars. And now, just like that, NASA scientists have suddenly changed their minds. The lab results of the soil samples have been reassessed and the new results demonstrate that “organics” were present on Mars in 1976. The new consensus of scientific opinion is that Viking did find evidence of microbial life on the planet’s surface.

Why is the mainstream media re-releasing this story to the world in the middle of April, 2012? The new study that determined “organics” were present on the red planet was first announced in an article that was published by Discovery News on January 4, 2011. Why are the fake news agencies pushing old news from 2011 as if it was just released a few hours ago?

Is this an attempt by “the powers that be” to prepare the masses for an upcoming announcement that intelligent life exists on Mars? Is the secret finally being let out of the bag?

With the introduction of undeniable evidence by researchers, Norman Bryden (Marsstructures.com) and Joseph Skipper (marsanomalyresearch.com) it’s getting harder for NASA to maintain its ridiculous position that Mars is a dead and barren world. Bryden and Skipper have located buildings, towers, foliage, waterways, and civilization evidence on the Martian surface, and they’ve done so using NASA’s photographs.

What else could NASA possibly do? They’ve put themselves in an extremely awkward situation by covering up, for so many years, the fact that Mars is apparenly littered with intelligent life. Enter their latest piece of spin news; a story that claims scientists have reevaluated a three decade old lab experiment and the new results demonstrate microbial life is present on Mars.

Many citizens will applaud the new Mars study while a large segment of the population will cling to primitive belief systems that preclude followers from entertaining ideas about the existence of life off world.

In the end, NASA was able to maneuver itself into a much better position than it had been in prior to the “life on Mars announcement.” The space agency has gotten away with hiding important information from the country and the general population could care less.

What do you think about this developing story?