Dr. John Reizer
My wife and I recently stopped by The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History. So, of course, we couldn’t resist going into the dinosaur section.
The one constant theme you will encounter in The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History as well as in The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum is that Earth is billions of years old, and we humans are cosmic pieces of dust that are only present because of some giant explosion.
Let’s Travel Billions of Years through Time
Smithsonian Museum Wall Display
Throughout this very elaborate and impressive Smithsonian dinosaur display, people are confronted with giant reptiles (dragons) reconstructed by paleontologists using synthetically molded parts made or cast from fossilized/petrified animal bones. Remember that the scientists performing the dinosaur reconstructions are university graduates who fully embrace the official narrative claiming dinosaurs existed millions upon millions of years ago.
Based on academia, scientists have a bundle of preconceived tenets to work from when reconstructing a dinosaur. In my view, what these animals appear to be in a museum setting and what they once were in truthful reality are two completely different things.
Science wants us to believe that dinosaur bones that litter significant portions of the realm are millions of years old and that the process of bones and other organic matter turning into fossils requires such long periods to occur.
Fossilized Tree Remains from Arizona
Photo Credit – Melissa Reizer
Before you even get inside The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, there’s a giant display of petrified wood telling people that these samples are millions of years old.
But as I have written about on this platform before, rapid petrification and the fossilization of organic materials can and does occur all the time and it happens in a matter of seconds, not millions of years.
I first introduced the dragon dinosaur idea on NoFakeNews earlier this year. In our new book, The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again, we discuss the theory more thoroughly. I don’t think my theory is as wild and outlandish as it might initially appear.
When you think of dinosaurs and dragons, what makes you believe one animal was real and the other a mythical creation? Hollywood? Science? Carbon Dating?
Oh, what lies they have told!
Many science-minded people have concerns about the accuracy of carbon-dating technology. Is it another PCR test being utilized by the powers that be in an attempt to legitimize something (like our timeline) that is not real? I think it is!
Is this realm (simulation) as old as we have been told? Does time begin again after each reset? I think it does!
According to officialdom, humans have never witnessed dinosaurs or dragons outside of a movie theater. So, once again our beliefs and perceptions about these creatures are predicated on trusting sources that should not be trusted!
How is it possible that nearly every culture in our world has drawings and representations depicting giant dragons, and there are no such captures of dinosaurs? Dinosaurs weren’t even a thing until the mid-1800s when the term was first made up. Many Old-World explorers believe a reset occurred around this point.
What if, not very long ago, dragons, not dinosaurs, were slaughtered by a regularly recurring event (a programmatic reset) that’s natural within the parameters of our Matrix construct?
Extensive evidence exists of significant amounts of prior heat and scorching of the Earth’s terrain where dinosaur fossils are found.
What do you think?
The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again
Coming Thanksgiving Day!
This book ties everything together
Watch The Book Trailer
While most of us are preoccupied with a plethora of nonsense and other storylines intentionally placed in the mainstream news to keep us disconnected from more vitally essential subjects, a small percentage of the general public has awakened and swallowed the red pills.
Our book is written primarily for you — the red pillers! We believe The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again will serve as an essential launching point for most of its readers, who will then be able to do more extensive boots-on-the-ground research themselves.
PRE-ORDER NOW!
Pre-orders Available from Barnes & Noble
The Truth Told Through Comedic Fiction!
A Feature Film
Curing Cancer Was A Mistake!
Now Available on DVD
CLICK HERE FOR ALL MOVIE WATCH OPTIONS
Click the image to visit our movie website
NoFakeNews 
Thanks for sharing, Lisa! 👍
Yeah, the tools they use to date things are fraudulent, in many people’s opinions. Me included! 😀
Truth be told, we’re being lied to about our history and our controllers’ efforts to keep the false narrative ongoing in the minds of many is still strong.
John
Super article and a couple of great dragon videos, John!
I love that it was stated that these reptiles were not dinosaurs with short pathetic little arms, but that they were actually magnificent dragons with wings to take flight instead! 😀
Lisa
Nothing is True, Everything is a Lie by James W. Lee
“Throughout history, geologist, astronomer’s, etc., have relied on carbon dating to tell the world how old everything is, but guess what? It doesn’t work! Never has, the just tell us now. Deemed the gold standard of archaeology, the method was developed in the late 1940s and is based on the idea that radiocarbon (carbon 14) is being constantly created in the atmosphere by cosmic Ray’s which then combine with atmospheric oxygen to form into plants during photosynthesis.
When the plant or animal that consumed the foliage dies, it stops exchanging carbon with the environment and from there on in it is simply a case of measuring how much carbon 14 has been emitted, giving its age, in simplistic terms. New research conducted by Cornell University has destroyed archaeological past history dating showing that there are a number of inaccuracies in commonly accepted carbon dating standards. Past history records are now deemed unreliable.
In a paper published to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team led by archaeologist Stuart Manning identified variations in the carbon 14 cycle at certain periods of time throwing off timelines by as much as a hundred years. “There has been much debate for several decades among scholars arguing for different chronologies sometimes only decades to a century apart, each with major historical implications. And yet these studies […] may all be inaccurate since they are using the wrong radiocarbon information.,” Manning said. ” Our work should prompt a round of revisions and rethinking for the timeline of the archaeological and early history of the southern Levant through the early biblical period.”