Which of the following theories sounds crazier?

Dr. John Reizer

Theory #1 – Not Proven!

1. Fourteen billion years ago nothing existed and then suddenly there was a miraculous explosion that occurred. Out of that explosion all the matter in the universe was created and blasted into a vacuum of infinite space.

Now that matter was traveling through space, time was created. For time to exist, physical matter must move through space.

As time passed, the matter continued to move outward into the vacuum of space eventually collapsing on itself forming the stars, planets, and all celestial bodies.

Billions of years after the explosion, Earth formed and somehow developed an atmosphere, oceans, and life.

Presently, Earth, a part of the original matter created from the big bang is still moving away from the huge explosion at over 440,000 mph. The planet is also orbiting a star, another piece of dust that emerged from the big bang at a speed of 67,000 mph. Additionally, the Earth (a ball) is spinning on its axis at a speed of 1,000 mph. All three motions continue year after year and have been doing so for billions of years.

Amazingly, the star (sun) moved 93 million miles away from the Earth, just the appropriate distance to nurture life on Earth and the Moon moved 238,000 miles from Earth and just coincidentally happened to be placed in a position to affect ocean tides that were vital to Earth’s marine life. Not only did the sun and Moon get strategically positioned where they are, but they also accidentally got placed in locations so that when they are observed from Earth by human eyes, the two celestial objects appear to be the same size and diameter.

If I told a sane person the narrative I just wrote about in this article, they would most likely think I was crazy. Yet, this is what modern science believes is the explanation of how the universe was created and how life on a blue marble called Earth began.

Theory #2 – Not Proven!

2. The Earth is a flat plain of land that stretches north, south, east, and west. It is the center of the universe and everything in space (the planets and stars) moves around the flat plain. Additionally, the Earth is encased in a dome called the firmament that precludes anything from entering or exiting the planet’s atmosphere.

Outer space is nonexistent and any references to space travel are fake and impossible.

Theory #3 – Not Proven!

3. The Earth is a grand simulation created by a Vast Intelligence that’s written the game’s specific instructions in the form of universal frequencies that are solidified into a holographic illusion perceived as reality by computers known as human and animal brains.

The game’s avatars are, in reality, the genetic expressions of very specific computer codes recently discovered by human beings and named DNA.

The Earth is neither a ball nor a flat plain but merely a holographic illusion, a carefully designed simulation where immortal souls can experience being different sentient life forms to gather experiential knowledge for the same Vast Intelligence that ultimately designed the simulation for that very purpose.

No matter what direction you look at and how far you travel, the simulation creates infinite land and or space, like in a video game.

Quantum physicists are now proposing that the solid objects that make up the universe are comprised of subatomic particles that fluctuate between being solid and invisible. In other words, everything that appears to be made of varying degrees of substance is made of hollow particles that sometimes do not exist.

Is it possible we are living in a holographic universe — a computer simulation — and just don’t realize it?

_____________________

New Science Fiction by John Reizer

Five decades after Apollo brought The Blue Marble back from the Moon, the most dangerous object in the world is missing and threatening the human race.

Available on Kindle for $0.99

“They found more than just rocks on the moon!”

A Novella By John Reizer

_____________________

“This is talented storytelling on a completely different level.” — Readers’ Favorite Reviews

_____________________

TARGET LIST

“Curing Cancer Was Their First Mistake!”

An Exciting Announcement is Coming Soon!

TheTargetListMovie.com

Feature Film Coming in 2023

Take a peek at some scenes from different Mad Wife Productions including a few clips from Target List. The trailer is coming soon!

13 thoughts on “Which of the following theories sounds crazier?

  1. Kenneth T. October 23, 2022 / 9:16 pm

    When you put it that way…

    but —
    Wait a cotton-picking minute!
    I’ve got a book in my collection that tells a story of a magical guy who created everything (including land, water, air, light, plants, and animals) AND I mean EVERYTHING.
    So there’s that version as well.

  2. Kenneth T. October 23, 2022 / 9:23 pm

    Hmmm…
    There’s a reason for the holodeck idea from the Star Trek franchise.

    It exposes “the truth” in a simplistic fashion

    “Ship in a Bottle”https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_in_a_Bottle_(Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation)

    • Dr. John Reizer October 23, 2022 / 9:28 pm

      Very cool…thanks for sharing this, Kenneth! 👍

      John

  3. Kenneth T. October 23, 2022 / 9:28 pm

    I’d like to believe the “flat” explanation but even I see issues with that (still easier to believe than #1)
    The third explanation is by far the easiest to believe – with our current (not the hidden stuff obviously) technology.

    ~Kenneth

    • Dr. John Reizer October 23, 2022 / 10:12 pm

      Ain’t that the truth, Kenneth? #1 to me is hard to believe at all. Flat Earth has some things in the narrative that are definitely questionable. The simulation, as crazy as that may seem to some people, is not only plausible, but it makes plenty of sense from a genetic code standpoint. It is food for thought, that is for sure. 🤣

      John

  4. lhakes12 October 23, 2022 / 10:08 pm

    This is so good, John. So much good story telling!
    With number one being the popular view. Where people are so used to hearing this scenario, that unless you really scrutinize it you think it’s perfectly normal.
    Then number two was only just introduced to me recently. And I was intrigued, but it honestly confused me a bit.
    I like number three. It resonates with me. Yes, it’s quite fastastic and wild to think that way, but I believe in energy frequencies. Afterall, we are all electric beings with our bodies being our outer shells. (Biological spacesuits! 😀)
    And what our human senses perceive is an illusion. It is only our sixth sense (consciousness) that can tune into the vast intelligence or God. Where we are all connected. And although our avatars have been given their specific codes, underneath are our souls. Where their place in this game or illusion can vary depending on our past experiences and reincarnations.
    And it is a wide array of simulations that we may have been a part of that have determined our frequency levels.

    Lisa

    • Dr. John Reizer October 23, 2022 / 10:22 pm

      I can tell in a few sentences whether someone understands the simulation theory or not, and you get it!

      It’s hard for people to accept that we might be living in a simulation because the idea seems too sci-fi based but look at scenario #1 — the big bang theory. Really?

      Another reason people find it difficult to embrace the simulation concept is that it doesn’t fit their religious faith. But it doesn’t have to change your belief in God or a Creator. The simulation is the technical way the Creator has invented the world and allows spiritual beings to be born into physicality.

      Thanks for sharing, Lisa! 👍🙂

      John

      • lhakes12 October 23, 2022 / 10:42 pm

        🙂

  5. Tamax October 24, 2022 / 9:20 am

    Good Day Dr. Reizer! Just my thoughts, creation is beyond human understanding, a very simple logic, if human creation ( technology, languages, etc.) comes from a great mind, I cannot imagine how great is the mind who started the creation ( the Supreme being or GOD the creator.) Just look, how the eco system works ( all the living things in earth) how the behave, the functionality of the Sun, the Moon etc., the functionality and purpose of every plants, trees and all the minerals resources here in earth, their is no logic if they come from nothing. Everything is govern by law and order. Human is stubborn they insist their non-sense theories.

  6. Roark October 24, 2022 / 12:23 pm

    I too, wrestle with the globe Earth, so I was excited to learn NoFakeNews was attending a Flatober event and planned to report on it.

    I struggle with #3. Is your reasoning sort of the opposite of Musk’s “It has to be real because it looks so fake”? In other words, it has to be fake, because it looks so real?

    I realize individual atoms are largely open spaces, thus not as solid as they might appear.

    For me, the globe has problems that the flat Earth doesn’t. There’s the numerous experiments repeatedly conducted, suggesting the observers are able to see “too far” on a curved ball.

    #3, the simulation Earth seems like a distraction to me. For all intents and purposes, real or simulated, it is real to us; it is our reality.

    May God forgive me, but even as a child, I’ve had to wonder: Who created God? To be fair, I would also wonder: If the Big Bang created everything, where did *that* (albeit small) but if matter come from?

    This chicken vs egg first type of question is a bottomless rabbit hole to be certain!

    We were originally talking about the shape of the Earth, yes? Now, all of a sudden, we’re really entering into the speculative nature of the unprovable.

    For #1, all the globalists had to do, to put the shape debate to rest, was: point one of their supposed cameras-in-space at the earth, showing us *real* photos and even a live stream of the globe Earth. But they didn’t and probably won’t. This would seem to rule out #1.

    #3 seems to sidestep the shape debate. Yet it occurs to me that Earth would have a shape, real or perceived, regardless.

    I see the hollow Earth as a variation of either the globe or the flat Earth.

    • Dr. John Reizer October 24, 2022 / 1:43 pm

      Thanks for the feedback, Roark. It’s an interesting puzzle, that’s for sure. I can tell you are a deep thinker. 🙂

      I don’t believe the Earth is a spinning ball either because there have been enough land-based experiments that negate such a possibility in my mind. The math doesn’t add up for me and therefore does not confirm the veracity of the model accepted and embraced by mainstream science.

      Big bang also excludes the possibility of intelligent design and anyone with two functioning brain cells knows that our existence on this platform or whatever this is, didn’t occur by accident. Something very intelligent created life on Earth.

      Is the Earth flat? Is the Earth an isosceles triangle? Is the Earth a ball? Those are the questions everyone wants to know the answers to and secret societies (the controlling powers) have been hiding information about since the game began.

      Shape, structure, and substance are perceived as real things within the construct of the simulation. It doesn’t mean that they are real things outside the Matrix.

      What we see with our eyes are light frequencies turned into images by our brains. What we hear with our ears are frequency waves converted into intelligible sounds by our brains. What we taste, smell and feel are molecules interacting with sensory organs. The molecules fluctuate between physical particles and frequency signatures. In other words, they don’t necessarily exist as our intelligently designed sensory organs might lead us to believe.

      The scientific facts I just listed lead me to the conclusion that life here on Earth might be a frequency-generated holographic simulation and that all life forms are biological avatars interacting within a computer simulation.

      If we genetically alter the game code (DNA) we can modify the expressions of the avatars (life). We see this regarding cells, tissues, organs, organ systems, and people. We also see this regarding plants.

      While in the simulation, substance, and structure are important to us, so we want to know what is the Earth’s shape. I want to know its shape, too, if it has one.

      John

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.