
Dr. John Reizer
Foucault pendulums are usually placed inside or near planetariums to reinforce the idea in the public’s mind that the Earth is a spinning ball traveling through the vacuum of outer space.
A Foucault Pendulum

Creative Commons- Wikipedia
The Claim:
“A swinging pendulum—specifically a Foucault pendulum—provides direct, visual proof that the Earth is a rotating sphere. It demonstrates that the planet is turning beneath the pendulum, rather than the pendulum itself changing direction.” [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The claim that a swinging Foucault pendulum proves the Earth rotates is quite flawed, according to some science-minded individuals. In this physics article, the scientific conclusion is that a swinging Foucault pendulum doesn’t prove that the Earth is a spinning ball.
If the Earth were actually rotating beneath the pendulum, the Earth’s spin should cause a resting pendulum to start swinging, but it does not. Because a pendulum will stay perfectly still unless pushed by an outside force, the pendulum claim falls flat, no pun intended.
But wait… Science says: “No physicist claims that Earth’s rotation causes a pendulum to swing. The claim is that gravity initiates the swing. The claim is that Earth’s rotation causes the plane of an already-swinging pendulum to rotate (precess) relative to the ground slowly.“
There are strong and scientifically sound arguments that point out these pendulums, which, according to some, swing long enough to exhibit the behaviors described above, have electromagnetic motors that enable their swing, and that the magnetic field they generate creates the pendulum effect, not the Earth’s spin.
Museums and their props
There’s an interesting aspect of museums that is often overlooked, in my view; they’re a rigged playground set up to show people props designed to reinforce officialdom. That’s why plenty of them are free to enter.
I remember walking into one of the Smithsonian Museums in Washington, DC, and right outside, before you even entered, was a display showing what was alleged to be 300-million-year-old petrified logs.
Fossilized Tree Remains from Arizona

Photo Credit – Melissa Reizer– Smithsonian Museum of Natural History
That outside display is central to the idea that the dinosaurs inside the museum existed in the timelines promoted, and the museum designers want people to buy into and embrace the false timelines and narratives our controllers promote.
It’s pure nonsense because a phenomenon called Rapid Petrification exists, whereby tremendous heat from lightning or cataclysmic events can petrify something in a matter of seconds, not millions of years.
Likewise, a Foucault pendulum commonly displayed in museums or nearby planetarium exhibits is used to reinforce the heliocentric lie currently promoted by officialdom.
The powers that be print and publish nonsense all the time, and people gobble it up without thinking or researching any of the claims.
I don’t believe our Earth, or realm, is a flat disc or a ball in outer space. I believe our realm and existence here are the products of a 3-D holographic simulation.
From a human perspective, I believe our realm extends infinitely in all directions laterally, excluding movement upward toward what we call the heavens or outer space.
I believe human and animal avatars naturally perceive it this way because the Matrix construct was written in computer code to be perceived that way by our sensory organs and brains.
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie
Inventing a cancer cure was their first mistake!
Sometimes fiction is not an escape from reality, but rather the only way to talk about it.
–John Reizer
Watch the Movie Trailer
Click on the posters below to watch Target List
Critical Reviews
“Rachel Alig is terrific as Donna while Justin Ray as Clyde also manages to impress. Combining witty commentary with a constant threat to life, script writers Palo and Reizer develop a narrative that is funny and charming while ensuring that none of the thrill and danger is lost in the process.”– INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Drama, thrills, comedy and so much more: Directors Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo’s Target List has all the fixings of a great movie. Combining a fantastic cast with the witty writing of MJ Palo and John Reizer, whichever way you flip this film, it lands on its feet with feline agility.”– INDY REVIEWS
“The script by Palo with John Reizer, for the most part, rides that perfect balance between its more dramatic moments and perfectly placed moments of humor that never distract. While they’re probably not going to get invited to any big pharma conventions anytime soon, Reizer and Palo have a point, and they make it beautifully.”
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”– RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
Our Latest Movie Journalist’s Review
“Target List is done with great attention to cinematic details and climactic maturation of the plot. The topic is timely. The dialogue is good and fits the characters. The action scenes are minimalistic but contextually relevant and come with a feel of action usually seen in TV movies.”
-Indie Clips Magazine – June 2026
Gareth Icke – Derby, England

“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!“
GARETH ICKE – DIRECTOR OF THE DAVID ICKE WEBSITE




A lot of great information as usual, Lisa! 👍😎
There’s so much nonsense mixed in with officialdom; it’s hard to pick out what’s most ridiculous.
John
A fascinating article, John! 😎
A lot of scientific nonsense as usual. But when they put on these displays in front of people’s eyes, they seem to gobble it right up.
And I’m no scientist myself, but there seems to be a lot of evidence to suggest that gravity doesn’t even exist. Just another lie to support their claims.
Lisa
“Gravity DOES NOT Exist
GRAVITY IS A LIE
MATTER WILL RISE, FALL OR
FLOAT DEPENDING ON RELATIVE
DENSITY TO THE MEDIUM”
Psychedelicizayionism3.0
“This is the best proof that gravity is fake. Why does a massive cruise ship float on water while a tiny pebble sinks straight to the bottom? That question has been sitting in the back of your mind since you were a kid. You just never had anyone actually answer it properly until now. And when you hear the real reason explanation, not the textbook one, something is going to shift in how you see the world.
School says it’s about buoyancy. The ship displaces water equal to it’s weight, so it floats. Sounds clean, sounds smart. But wait. That same water that lovingly holds up a cruise ship swallows a pebble instantly. A pebble weighs almost nothing at all. So which one is it? Does water support heavy things or not? Because right now it seems like water just picks favorites. And here’s the part nobody stops to question, if gravity is pulling the ship down with thousands of tons of force, what exactly is pushing back hard enough to win that fight every single time? They’ll say water pressure, but then why doesn’t water pressure save the pebble?
Something in this story keeps quietly shifting everytime you look too close. You’ve been trusting a system of explanations your whole life that changes its own rules depending on what needs to be explained. That’s not science. That’s storytelling. And the wildest part? You never questioned because everyone around you didn’t either. That’s how it stays in place, not because it’s proven, because it’s repeated. What if the real answer was something your own eyes could verify? No lab, no equation, no space agency required. On a flat plane model, what matters is density and displacement, not gravitational pull toward a ball. Objects less dense than fluid around them rise. Denser ones sink. Simple, visible, testable. Steel shaped into a hollow hull holds mostly air inside, making its overall density lower than water. The pebble is solid and dense all the way through. Water responds to density, not weight.”
flatearthantarctica