The real purpose of Artemis II was to quell the growing trend of public opinion, suggesting space travel missions are fake

Dr. John Reizer

Artemis II has launched its payload, taken four crew members beyond low Earth orbit, captured a new Blue Marble image of Earth, slingshot around the Moon, taken additional photos of outer space: some showing a starfield, shown videos of astronauts in a gravity-free environment, and proved the Earth wasn’t flat.

What else can NASA do to quell the growing trend of public opinion challenging officialdom’s claims that space travel missions are genuine and not filmed in a CGI studio in front of a green screen?

Photo Credit: Instagram

Skeptics like me point out that the vast majority of NASA photography is starless, Photoshopped-looking stills of blackness with pictures of Earth,  Moon, spacecraft, and astronauts copied and pasted to deceive the public.

Not a single star in sight!

NASA hears my skepticism and immediately provides a breathtaking view of the Milky Way photographed by Artemis astronauts.

What’s wrong with people like me who refuse to be convinced of the veracity of the NASA narrative?

The skeptics demand proof of successful space travel, and NASA almost always delivers the goods to support its storyline.

It took 54 years for NASA and its astronauts to get beyond low Earth orbit again and travel around the Moon; something Apollo’s astronauts did on multiple missions much better. The Apollo astronauts landed on the Moon and drove a go-kart, and they did so with one-tenth of today’s claimed technologies before cell phones and personal computers were even a thing. Can you imagine that? 🤣

We’re told that solid iron rocks fall from the sky and burn up into nothingness before they reach the ground. NASA spacecraft reenter Earth unscathed, even though they follow the same path as the iron rocks. We’re told NASA has magical paint that it applies to the Orion spacecraft that creates a heat shield, protecting the craft and crew.

Don’t be a skeptic. Forget about critical thinking and questioning a space travel narrative that has more holes in it than imported cheese from Switzerland.

Artemis II has proven that space travel is possible and that, although it was a painful process, human ingenuity can rebuild a lost technology and nearly replicate the spaceflight accomplishments of half a century ago.

Stop being a naysayer, Dr. Reizer, and stop questioning science. Learn to embrace and admire all the new starless space photos, except for the one photo of the Milky Way, where the astronauts captured a billion stars in one image.

The Artemis II movie is nearly complete and in the books. Space travel to foreign worlds is back, and countless space missions to the Moon and Mars are planned, along with the collection of taxpayers’ dollars to fund them.


Coming May 2nd

From the Author of The Target List Story

Click here to read the author interview


Help us spread the word!


Watch it tonight!

The Truth Told Through Fiction!

Do you honestly believe that Big Pharma wants to eradicate a $217 billion a year cancer industry?

Click on the images above to watch Target List


From the author of The Target List story

Coming July 4th, 2026

Click here to read the author interview!

Pre-order Now!


Become a Beta Reader!

If you’re interested in becoming a beta reader for John Reizer’s fictional stories, please send your email address via the NFN website’s contact page.

Beta readers receive free advance copies of selected new works in exchange for non-biased feedback or reviews.


The Truth Told Through Comedic Fiction!

A Feature Film

Curing Cancer Was A Mistake!


Click on the images below to Watch Target List


“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!”  — GARETH ICKE

– DIRECTOR OF THE DAVID ICKE WEBSITE


“… I believe in the future he could be esteemed as one of the prophets of science fiction. If you’re not familiar with John Reizer’s works, you should be.”

— Amazon Reviewer


Click on the image below to visit the website!

4 thoughts on “The real purpose of Artemis II was to quell the growing trend of public opinion, suggesting space travel missions are fake

  1. NoFakeNews's avatar NoFakeNews April 10, 2026 / 2:19 pm

    Exactly!

  2. Kenneth T.'s avatar Kenneth T. April 10, 2026 / 1:14 pm

    Who will verify their (uhhh) verification?

  3. NoFakeNews's avatar NoFakeNews April 10, 2026 / 10:11 am

    It’s so funny that you say that, Lisa. Over the years of reading astronaut dialogue from missions and interviews, I have come across numerous crew admissions that space was black and that the stars were not visible in many situations.

    These clowns keep changing the storylines and narratives because they have never been in space to witness anything like they’re trying to describe. It’s one hundred percent baloney!

    Now, we’re finally getting a few photos with stars visible from NASA, thanks to social media comments poking fun at the CGI images they’re trying to pass off as genuine space photography. The Milky Way shot is laughable, to say the least. They go from capturing no stars to finding rich star clusters and gaseous nebulae.

    John

  4. lhakes12's avatar lhakes12 April 10, 2026 / 10:00 am

    Marvelously stated, John! 🙂

    And it’s s funny that some people can believe that the Apollo mission was fake years ago, but yet this time around they believe it’s real. I had such a conversation with someone. I told her that it’s fake this time as well, and that they use CGI. She said, “What’s that?” I said Computerized Generated Images. She got quiet. I’m think that a bell rang off in her head, but she still wanted to believe that this current mission was real.

    I just thought it strange that she could admit to herself that in the past it was all a charade, although now it was all possible to her.

    I think the programming on television, and other people were affecting her perception.

    In addition, I do think that people are asking questions about the missing stars, John. So, then they used the CGI to provide a delightful array of the Milky Way to try to satisfy them.

    But I had seen on the news where the woman astro’not briefly commented that the blackness was so beautiful or something like that. Haha! 😄

    I guess the stars are particular as to where they decide to shine for the camera. 🤣

    Lisa

Leave a comment