They can’t even predict the weather on Earth! 🤣
What A Fool Believes
According to officialdom, “NASA has achieved numerous milestones in space exploration, including the first human moon landing, the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope, and the Space Shuttle program, all while pushing the boundaries of scientific understanding and technological innovation.” — Google AI Overview
Exoplanets
“The reporting of the discovery of exoplanets by NASA and space agencies realm-wide is fast becoming a common occurrence on Internet sites. It is also not unusual to see these reports featured as mainstream media headlines on various platforms.
Exoplanets are celestial bodies or planets outside the parameters of our eight or nine-planet solar system. The idea of additional planets existing outside our solar system was considered pseudo-science for most of our lives. But over the last 20 years, it seems NASA and the space exploration community have convinced the world’s citizenry that they have identified countless exoplanets rich in precious metals and containing atmospheres filled with oxygen capable of possibly sustaining human and animal life.
According to NASA, these new potential homes for humanity are out there for exploration; humans only need to figure out how to get there. The problem is that all the exoplanets are millions of light-years away from Earth. According to NASA and officialdom, getting astronauts to these locations might present modern science with a slight problem.
We want to write at this point that getting astronauts there will present NASA and any other fake space programs with more than a slight problem.
When NASA and other space agencies claim that they have discovered one or more exoplanets in the deep cosmos of space, they aren’t seeing any celestial bodies. Instead, they analyze the flicker of starlight, and based on the star’s flicker, scientists can supposedly tell if one or more exoplanets orbit that star or sun. The science theory in play here states that a star’s flicker has to do with its wobble, and a star’s wobble has to do with how many exoplanets are orbiting a given star or sun.
We respectfully disagree with NASA and believe the only thing wobbling concerning this subject matter is the mainstream science theory alleging it can discover exoplanets by measuring starlight flicker.
We are supposed to believe without questioning the science that because people on Earth have observed and analyzed the flickering light of stars allegedly hundreds of millions of light-years away, NASA and other scientists can determine the complete composition of exoplanetary bodies, their associated atmospheres, weather patterns, and a long list of other details including how far away they are from Earth. Well, perhaps not how far away they are from Earth, at least not from the star’s flicker. The distances that objects are from Earth are calculated from mathematical equations predicated on the Big Bang baloney sandwich served to the gullible public ever since George Henri Joseph Edouard Lemaitre dreamt up the ridiculous theory.”
-From The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again book
Watch Target List Now!
Watch Target List on YouTube
NoFakeNews 
It seems like the crazier the theories and ideas are, the more people embrace them. It’s mind-blowing what people perceive to be logical and acceptable answers to important questions.
John
John, I remember when I first read about these exoplanets in your book, The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again. This information was completely new to me. Or should I say this type of storytelling was completely new to me.
It boggles the mind how they can base this so-called science on flickering lights, and how they wobble! 🤣
I mean really! Who comes up with this crazy stuff?
Lisa