
Many years ago, while teaching a radiographic course at a chiropractic college, a student asked me why various bone cancers appear differently on radiographs (x-rays).
In my opinion, good students are continually searching for the answers to many important and interesting questions.
Let me clarify what the student meant for readers. X-ray images of one cancer, such as osteosarcoma, may look like new bone forming in a “sunburst” pattern or a white, cloud-like lesion. Another bone cancer might appear on X-ray images as a punched-out area in your bone, which is a classic indicator of something called Multiple Myeloma.
I’ve Been Searchin’ So Long
I understood the new student’s challenges when looking at films (today’s digital images). It’s not always easy to spot the subtle differences between normal-looking presentations on radiographs and pathological ones.
I told the student that when biological pathways are dammed up, it creates different bad expressions of physiology which themselves have unique characteristics that end up appearing in specific ways on X-rays.
I explained to the student that what she saw in a radiographic presentation showing cancer was, in actuality, an expression of physiology gone bad. The problem was not actually in the bone, but rather somewhere else in the biological pathways of that individual.
Modern medicine identifies cancers with X-ray images and confirms the diagnoses with laboratory tests. But is that really where the person’s problem is, or is that where the expression of a blocked biological pathway shows its ugly head?
The problem with medical science is that it’s bought and paid for by corporations that don’t want various diseases (intellectual properties) eradicated. The research being performed aims to mitigate diseases indefinitely without finding solutions that would make said disorders disappear for good.
I don’t care where a cancerous lesion is in the body or shows up on an X-ray; that’s not the problem area, in my view. That expression of the problem comes from blocked physiological pathways somewhere else.
Medicine wants to study the physiological endpoints of bad expressions instead of clearing out the physiological pathways being interfered with.
When I explain my ideas about permanently eliminating chronic illnesses by focusing on clearing interferences from integral biological pathways, most medical people look at me like I am crazy. Instead, they want to keep injecting people with chemotherapy drugs and radiating tumors they have located.
Medicine has been performing such cancer treatments for decades without much success at all. It’s because they’re addressing an expression of a problem instead of the problem. OMG, it’s not that difficult to figure this stuff out. I’m a simple little chiropractor, and I figured this out during my third semester in college.
If you were looking into a mirror and saw a mustard stain on your mouth, would you try to wipe away the stain with a damp cloth by rubbing the mirror or your mouth? You would wipe away the stain on your mouth. The mirror’s reflection of the stain is not going to be your area of focus in resolving the problem, right?
You can’t convince medicine to stop trying to clean the damn mirror. 🤣
If I had a hundred dollars for every moron who tells me that there could never be an instrument, like the one in the Target List movie that could eradicate all forms of cancer, I would be a very rich man.
Not only would the instrument I describe in the Target List story work in real life, but I believe it would eliminate all chronic illnesses if it could clear out key vital biological pathways that were blocked or reset the integrity of health on a cellular level.
I have figured out in this lifetime that the people who know the least about a particular subject have the loudest mouths in a room or forum.
A New Free Book!
Over 15K Downloads Already! 👍

What if Artificial Intelligence is not what we’ve been led to believe?
Free Download!
Curing Cancer Was A Mistake!
Millions Have Watched, But Have You?

Target List is an independent action-comedy-thriller film from 2023. The story centers on two scientists who invent a groundbreaking, non-invasive cure for cancer, which puts them on the run from a ruthless assassin hired by a corrupt pharmaceutical company.
Plot summary
- The invention: Scientists Donna (Rachel Alig) and Clyde (Justin Ray) have developed a medical device called “WAND” that can cure cancer using wave-particle-fluctuation physics without surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation.
- Big pharma’s threat: After the invention is announced, the pair and their research team are targeted by a fictional pharmaceutical corporation named Orphium. The company hires an assassin to eliminate the scientists and suppress the cure.
- The chase: Following an initial attack, Donna and Clyde escape, only to find themselves framed for the murder of their colleagues. The film follows their fast-paced, action-filled journey as they try to outrun the assassin and clear their names.
- Action and comedy: While the premise is serious, the film is noted for its mix of action and humor, with comedic moments arising from the chemistry between the protagonists as they find themselves in a high-stakes situation.
Filmmakers and cast
- Directors: Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo.
- Writers: MJ Palo and John Reizer.
- Key cast:
- Rachel Alig as Donna
- Justin Ray as Clyde
- Charlie Manoukian
How to watch
Target List is available to watch on various streaming platforms:
Click On A Platform Below To
Watch Target List
Watch Now In:
🇦🇺 Australia 🇧🇪 Belgium 🇧🇬 Bulgaria
🇨🇦 Canada 🇨🇿 Czech Republic 🇬🇷 Greece
🇲🇽 Mexico 🇳🇴 Norway 🇵🇭 Philippines
🇨🇭 Switzerland 🇬🇧 United Kingdom 🇺🇸 USA






Thanks, Ashley! I will fix the glitch and get the submit an article page back online.
John
9/4/25
Hi John,
Your “Submit an Article” link at the top is missing, so I am sharing this important story here: https://healthimpactnews.com/2025/shocking-epstein-victims-testimonies-in-d-c-as-they-plead-with-trump-to-release-the-files-trump-replies-it-is-a-democratic-hoax/
Thank you,
Ashley
Thanks for commenting, Lisa! I really appreciate your feedback. And yes, they always prefer the flow of money over the cure. 👍🙂
John
As always, John, no one explains the truth of what is in front of us like you do.👍 They have made something so simple and logical so complicated. And people believe it.
They prefer the money trail route!
Lisa
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts on this subject, Kenneth! 🙂👍
John
Cancer research… Big BIg BIG money.
I’d rather put my money into development for a device like The Wand, instead of like the money which is being given today for research.
And for the record – I HAVE experienced cancer (maybe not first hand) but very close all the same. And I have given to that “charity” – That doesn’t change the fact that the “real” research is sorely lacking