Why is the legal decision known as Roe v. Wade about to be overturned?
Let me explain what is going on.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a legal decision that stated the US Constitution protects a pregnant woman’s right to have an abortion without government interference.
Roe v. Wade has stood the test of time from January 22, 1973, until recently.
So, why reverse the decision now? The answer is because millions upon millions of women have been sterilized by the COVID-19 vaccines. Additionally, millions upon millions of people have been killed by the bioweapons.
If the law is left intact, the drastic decrease in abortion statistics would paint a truthful picture of what is happening to the world’s population.
I still believe most people don’t understand what is happening in the world concerning the global genocide. It’s bad folks!
If the leaked information about the Supreme Court possibly reversing Roe v. Wade is not a smoking gun, and a direct sign of a global genocide taking place, I don’t know what else would convince people.
_________________________
Target List Production – Picture of the Day!
May 3, 2022
Click here to see more behind-the-scenes photos of the Target List production!
Help support this motion picture project on GoFundMe!
NoFakeNews.net 
Yes John, that is a great point that the abortion statistics would be very revealing about what is happening in the world. No need for abortions, because sterilization from the covid vaccines will take of it.
But there are many advocates of Roe vs Wade that will not understand this. My son’s girlfriend is a strong advocate of Roe vs Wade. She is very liberal and regularly puts out that type of material on her Facebook. And I can tell you that she is in a tailspin over this. Plus, there are probably many other woman like her. This is going to further divide people and create more distractions.
The controlling powers will stop at nothing to be able to keep their agenda hidden!
Lisa
Most people will not critically think about this subject let alone connect any of the dots.
Thanks for sharing, Lisa!
John
Yes, I agree!