When people think of the United States, they envision the giant landmass that includes the 48 contiguous states located in the North American continent, Alaska, and Hawaii. What most people, including Americans, don’t realize is that there might be two countries in play here — the landmass that makes up America, and a federal corporation, Washington, DC.

Could this be true? Are there two United States in existence?

According to some sources, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a second and separate government within the continental United States of America. The foreign country (corporation) exists within a 20-mile sliver of land between Maryland and Virginia and is commonly known as the American Capital, Washington, DC.

Now I have to be perfectly honest with my readers concerning this subject. This is a highly polarizing topic that has been debated by many scholars and legal minds for a very long time. Many conventional legal opinions classify the information I am discussing in this post as nonsense. But just because something has been labeled as nonsense by the vast majority of people doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s not the truth. So despite the naysayers, let’s press on and look into this information further.

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 was a cleverly written and deceptive piece of legislation that created a separate country (corporation) within America. The new corporation became known as THE UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE US or the USA. You’ll notice that the corporate titles are in all CAPITAL LETTERS. I am not writing it that way for emphasis but rather to show that the titles represent a legal corporation that has been registered as such.

Legal corporations are written in capital letters. So when I write the UNITED STATES, I refer to the 20 miles of land located between Maryland and Virginia and not the vast landmass that exists in the North American continent.

According to some sources, THE UNITED STATES is a foreign corporation doing business in America. The President of THE UNITED STATES is the Chief Executive Officer of the corporation, and that is why the US President is located in Washington, DC.

This very complex legal theory suggests that the individual states have voluntarily opted in to become separate franchises of the registered corporation located in Washington, DC. This theory would mean that the individual states are also sub-corporations themselves and legally attached to the foreign corporation in Washington, DC. Wow, this gets complicated, but don’t leave now because it gets even better.

According to this source I reviewed, when people are born in America, a small sampling of their DNA is collected in the hospital and routinely held for a certain number of days. If the child’s birth parents do not claim that sample of genetic material, the federal government considers the live person dead. The child is not dead, but the child is deemed dead for legal purposes, and the government replaces the live child’s name with a corporate one. So if John Smith is born to Mr. and Mrs. Smith, John Smith, in the federal government’s eyes, is renamed as JOHN SMITH, the corporate entity and is referred to as a corporation for the remainder of his life by the government.

When JOHN SMITH does business with the federal government from this point forward, he will always be addressed with capital letters. The capitalization of letters applies to social security cards, birth certificates, bank statements, credit cards, etc. JOHN SMITH has been turned into a corporate entity by the federal government and issued a birth certificate (a registration number).

The UNITED STATES (the corporation) operates under admiralty or maritime law (the law of the sea) while the united states (the country) operates under common law (the law of the land). There is a big difference between the two laws, and for the sake of brevity, I am not going to go through all the differences in this post. But please feel free to look up this information because it is fascinating and confusing at the same time.

There are also two different flags used depending on whether you refer to the united states or THE UNITED STATES. THE UNITED STATES flag has a gold fringe included in its design. The united states flag does not. The flags look very similar, but they’re not the same. It’s pretty deceptive if you want my opinion.

Whenever you step inside a federal building or courtroom, you will always encounter a flag with a gold fringe. This gold fringe lets people know that you’re in a facility operating under admiralty/maritime law.

The UNITED STATES views its citizens as vessels or ships at sea. When you’re in your mother’s womb, you are floating in amniotic fluid (the sea). You come through the birth canal and are birthed by a doctor. Ships pass through canals as well. In a sense, phonetically speaking, you’re docked (doctor), and the merchandise is delivered. Just like when a ship is berthed and its inventory is delivered, a certificate is created with a registration number. When a child is born, a birth certificate number is issued. Later, a social security number is designed for the citizen. The corporate entity (person) is given citizenSHIP.

The federal government requires its citizens to have many different licenses throughout their lives to do business with the corporation. All of these documents are addressed to citizens with their names in CAPITAL LETTERS.

Now, here’s the kicker…

According to the theory, the federal government uses its citizens (corporate assets) as collateral to work with other countries that are set up as corporations that also have corporate assets (people). We are, in a sense, legal slaves to the governments of the world. Our corporate worth is valued and based upon what the corporate assets can make for the parent corporation (the federal government) over a lifetime of working and paying taxes. That value can be used as collateral when doing business with other corporations (countries).

Is it possible that a global genocide might be nothing more than a giant business transaction in the eyes of the controlling powers?

Could the world’s governments be in the process of eliminating some of their corporate assets that the parent global corporation no longer values?

What do you think about this subject?

____________________