Speaking on the Delta Variant…
“What we’re seeing, because of this increase in transmissibility, and because we have about 93 million people in this country who are eligible to get vaccinated who don’t get vaccinated — that you have a significant pool of vulnerable people.”
“And so when you look at the curve of acceleration of 7-day averages of cases per day, it is going up in a very steep fashion.”
–Dr. Anthony Fauci
Dr. Fauci continues to speak about the increase in false-positive case numbers recorded by an invalid diagnostic technology. He refuses to address the fact that his entire infectious disease paradigm is wholly predicated on scientific fraud.
The dialogue that comes from this doctor is designed to do two things:
- Scare people with a fake virus and its fictitious variants.
- Sell the lie that unvaccinated people are the reason false-positive case numbers keep climbing.
I would love to see Dr. Fauci debate, on national television, any one of the 12 superspreaders of health disinformation that the US government identified.
I don’t believe Dr. Fauci would fare very well in an organized debate about COVID-19 where actual scientific facts were required to make an intelligent argument. In my opinion, Dr. Fauci would lose such a debate without the protection of the mainstream media running interference for him and his false narrative by censoring the scientists and doctors who speak the truth.
I challenge you, Dr. Anthony Fauci, to debate someone on national television who is not paid to support the global psyop. I want to see you engage in a professional conversation with a qualified scientist who understands viral isolation and that sars-cov-2 is not an actual virus.
There have been no publicly aired scientific conversations between the people supporting the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines and the many scientific personalities that believe the vaccines are harming human beings.
Why have no scientific debates been allowed? Why is it that only one viewpoint concerning this new vaccine technology (the vaccines are great) has been made public? Why are any opinions that disagree with the benefits of the mRNA gene therapy vaccines immediately censored? Why are professional scientists with years of experience not permitted to speak publicly about their concerns with experimental medicines?