Are Holistic Doctors being killed?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Hello everybody! I just returned from a long vacation, but I have been following with great interest some very important stories that have been taking place this summer.

Earlier today, I received an email from one of my patients regarding a topic that some people in the alternative healthcare arena are very concerned about. As many of my readers are probably aware, a growing number of holistic healthcare providers have turned up dead or are mysteriously missing in the United States. There are various theories about what has happened to these individuals and it is fast becoming a scary situation for many practitioners that are viewed by others as being outside the parameters of conventional thinking with regards to healthcare.

Please take a look at the following video that does a great job of summarizing the current situation taking place.

 

In addition to the video, please read the following story by clicking here!

Sweet Misery: The Real Story Behind Aspartame

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

For the longest time there has been an ongoing debate taking place between various members in the health community about the possible dangers associated with the artificial sweetener, Aspartame. I have written several articles and books that have also discussed this subject and believe there is credible evidence in existence that proves this product is a very powerful neurotoxin.

The video and link below discuss some of the many concerns health professionals have regarding this product. As always, I try to publish materials that might be helpful to those readers looking to educate themselves and others about important topics.

 

http://www.mpwhi.com/report_on_aspartame_and_children.htm

The Real Matrix: Society’s Addiction to the Blue Pill

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

One of the greatest films ever released, in my opinion, was the original Matrix movie starring Keanu Reeves. The film, very cleverly, demonstrated the lack of understanding most people have regarding real world events. Truth be told, many of us are like the character in the Matrix movie, unable to crack specific security codes that would allow us to understand what is actually happening on our planet.

In the Matrix movie, the main character (Neo) is gradually awakened to the fact that nothing in the world is the way it appears. As the film evolves, Neo’s understanding of reality is eventually replaced with a truer representation of reality. The Neo character learns that the images of the world he has always embraced as being genuine have been disingenuously implanted in his mind by a computer operated world.

Throughout most of the movie, Neo tries to view the Matrix and make sense out of it. Even when he learns of its existence, he lacks the skill set to fully understand the different levels within the Matrix. To Neo, the Matrix initially appears as a never-ending list of numbers and letters that have been encrypted into an unbreakable code. At the end of the movie, Reeves is finally able to unlock the code and see the world for what it really is.

The Matrix Movie is a metaphor for real life. It illustrates, quite well, the fact that total reality and a human being’s perception of reality exist on different planes. What we think we know about our world and what the world really represents to us is not the same thing.

The basic theme of nofakenews.net is to raise awareness in readers about the machinations taking place by the powers that be that greatly influence mainstream media companies that, ultimately, keep members of society inside the confines of another Matrix. That’s right! We live in a real Matrix. Its existence lies outside the fictional plot that was a blockbuster movie.

Many people have enjoyed watching the Matrix movie. They fully understood the cinematic plot and yet they are unable to see The Real Matrix all of us live in every single day that we are alive. Many of us lack the skill set to be able to crack the necessary codes that would allow us to view our world as it actually exists.

Every time we tune into the mainstream news, we are, in a sense, taking the blue pill. In the Matrix movie, the blue pill represented amnesia, a prescription for keeping people blissfully ignorant about everything in life that made up the very fabric of their perceived reality. When presented with the opportunity, Neo decides not to swallow the blue pill. He chooses, instead, the red pill which allows him to explore another side of reality, an opportunity that few people, in his fictional world, have a chance to experience.

Mainstream media companies represent the blue pill in our world and there are more people in the world than ever before addicted to this longstanding prescription. As long as people continue to tune in to the mainstream media products that litter our society, people will be unable to see the world as it actually is.

Welcome to NoFakeNews.net!  We represent, like other alternative news producers, the red pill. A free subscription/prescription to this website is what some people might be lacking in their diet? Open up wide, swallow, and then view The Real Matrix that exists outside the movies.

Please feel free to peruse the many archived articles that exist on the right side of your computer screen. ENJOY!

Excellent Presentation About Water Fluoridation: Watch this Video!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In honor of Fluoride Awareness Week, I am featuring this excellent presentation that addresses the pros and cons associated with the practice of water fluoridation.

Please watch the following video:

For those people that are new to NoFakeNews.net, let me explain a few house rules about this electronic magazine:

1. This is a private website and you are cordially invited to peruse the various posts that have been written for the benefit of people looking for a different perspective on many subjects that are impacting and affecting human beings on a daily basis.

2. Feel free to leave a comment regarding a specific article or subject. If I like what you have to say I will publish your words of wisdom. If I think your comment is not suitable to publish for whatever reason I deem it inappropriate, it will not appear on the website.

3. Regarding health topics: Please do not attempt to clog up my comment boards with “officialdom” such as “peer-reviewed” research that demonstrates vaccines, Mercury, and Fluoride are safe for human beings. If you want to state an opinion such as this, make your post one time and please move on so others can be read.

4. Please do not attack or be rude to other posters because I promise you your comments will be removed from the site and you will lose the privilege of posting on NoFakeNews in the future.

5. If you do not like the house rules listed above, please feel free to unsubscribe from the website. I assure you that there are plenty of other interesting addresses to visit on the Internet.

 

Thanks!

Dr. John L. Reizer

 

 

Can We Really Trust Medical “Peer-Reviewed” Research?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

 reizer3In a recent article that I published here on NoFakeNews.net, I discussed at length the possible dangers associated with human beings ingesting Fluoride. I believe that because of the common practice of water fluoridation in the United States and other locations throughout the world, many people suffer poor health due to Fluoride poisoning.

Predictably, a number of Internet trolls immediately jumped on my comment board and inundated the website with copy and paste posts that allegedly originated from “peer-reviewed” studies. The research plastered all over my website, of course, defended the mainstream public health mindset that Fluoride is a safe substance in appropriate concentrations, etc.

Every once in awhile, I purposely author and post one of these controversial articles on my website in an effort to measure the response by various trolls that are working for the establishment that wants to desperately remove credibility from websites like mine that might influence readers to see a different perspective about a subject than what the powers that be have authorized.

In almost every situation where I have released articles about the harmful effects associated with Fluoride, amalgam fillings, and especially vaccinations, the copy and pasted materials used to defend conventional paradigms appear scripted in nature. The written words used by the posters to attack my position are almost always the same.

For example, a few years ago I published a very similar article to the one I released here on June 14, 2015 about water Fluoridation. In the article that I published in 2012, a dentist wrote the following commentary:

“The great 16th Century alchemist, Paracelsus said, ‘Every substance is a poison and only the proper dose determines a poison from a cure.’

The poster in the 2012 article was trying to make the point that Fluoride is only a poison if it is administered to humans in inappropriate concentrations. If you believe that piece of advice I have some swamp land in the Everglades to sell you.

Then I received a comment regarding my article from June 14, 2015 from another dentist and he wrote practically the same thing:

“16th Century European doctor and alchemist, Paracelsus, stated it well: ‘All substances are poisons: there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy.’”

I began thinking earlier today that these posters are working off the same damn script. The materials were pre-written along with the “peer-reviewed” research so that any dentist, doctor, or pretender could easily copy and paste them to a given website in order to defend the position in question being attacked. It is a brilliant strategy and demonstrates just how prepared the mainstream paradigm managers are in their efforts to keep members of society locked inside the box when it comes to certain subjects.

Regardless of the number of “peer-reviewed” research pieces being copy and pasted on this website or any other alternative news productions, it is important for readers to realize that a lot of scientific research is flawed and does not accurately represent the truth about the questions being examined.

There are tremendous amounts of bias in medical research due to the heavy influence that pharmaceutical companies have on institutions of higher learning and the federal government of the United States. This situation is fast becoming a serious problem for the scientific community as was reported in 2012 in an article published in the Washington Post.

According to another article written and published in The Atlantic magazine, “Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong.”

A publication put out by the University of California at Berkeley reported, “Almost 75% of U.S. clinical trials in medicine are paid for by private companies.” With statistics like these how can there ever be “peer-reviewed” research that is truly unbiased and representative of the truth regarding medicines and their effectiveness or ineffectiveness with regards to human subjects?

In the cases of Fluoride, Mercury, and vaccines, I have always found that it is probably better to rely on a little bit of common sense versus “peer-reviewed” research that often seems to defy the parameters of logic.

What do you think about this subject?

 

DISCLAIMER!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!