Archive | Health RSS feed for this section

Life After Death – Deepak Chopra

3 Jul

 

 

“Hear This Well: Vaccines Can And Do Cause Autism”

2 Jul

Excellent Presentation About Water Fluoridation: Watch this Video!

17 Jun

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In honor of Fluoride Awareness Week, I am featuring this excellent presentation that addresses the pros and cons associated with the practice of water fluoridation.

Please watch the following video:

For those people that are new to NoFakeNews.net, let me explain a few house rules about this electronic magazine:

1. This is a private website and you are cordially invited to peruse the various posts that have been written for the benefit of people looking for a different perspective on many subjects that are impacting and affecting human beings on a daily basis.

2. Feel free to leave a comment regarding a specific article or subject. If I like what you have to say I will publish your words of wisdom. If I think your comment is not suitable to publish for whatever reason I deem it inappropriate, it will not appear on the website.

3. Regarding health topics: Please do not attempt to clog up my comment boards with “officialdom” such as “peer-reviewed” research that demonstrates vaccines, Mercury, and Fluoride are safe for human beings. If you want to state an opinion such as this, make your post one time and please move on so others can be read.

4. Please do not attack or be rude to other posters because I promise you your comments will be removed from the site and you will lose the privilege of posting on NoFakeNews in the future.

5. If you do not like the house rules listed above, please feel free to unsubscribe from the website. I assure you that there are plenty of other interesting addresses to visit on the Internet.

 

Thanks!

Dr. John L. Reizer

 

 

Can We Really Trust Medical “Peer-Reviewed” Research?

16 Jun

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

 reizer3In a recent article that I published here on NoFakeNews.net, I discussed at length the possible dangers associated with human beings ingesting Fluoride. I believe that because of the common practice of water fluoridation in the United States and other locations throughout the world, many people suffer poor health due to Fluoride poisoning.

Predictably, a number of Internet trolls immediately jumped on my comment board and inundated the website with copy and paste posts that allegedly originated from “peer-reviewed” studies. The research plastered all over my website, of course, defended the mainstream public health mindset that Fluoride is a safe substance in appropriate concentrations, etc.

Every once in awhile, I purposely author and post one of these controversial articles on my website in an effort to measure the response by various trolls that are working for the establishment that wants to desperately remove credibility from websites like mine that might influence readers to see a different perspective about a subject than what the powers that be have authorized.

In almost every situation where I have released articles about the harmful effects associated with Fluoride, amalgam fillings, and especially vaccinations, the copy and pasted materials used to defend conventional paradigms appear scripted in nature. The written words used by the posters to attack my position are almost always the same.

For example, a few years ago I published a very similar article to the one I released here on June 14, 2015 about water Fluoridation. In the article that I published in 2012, a dentist wrote the following commentary:

“The great 16th Century alchemist, Paracelsus said, ‘Every substance is a poison and only the proper dose determines a poison from a cure.’

The poster in the 2012 article was trying to make the point that Fluoride is only a poison if it is administered to humans in inappropriate concentrations. If you believe that piece of advice I have some swamp land in the Everglades to sell you.

Then I received a comment regarding my article from June 14, 2015 from another dentist and he wrote practically the same thing:

“16th Century European doctor and alchemist, Paracelsus, stated it well: ‘All substances are poisons: there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy.’”

I began thinking earlier today that these posters are working off the same damn script. The materials were pre-written along with the “peer-reviewed” research so that any dentist, doctor, or pretender could easily copy and paste them to a given website in order to defend the position in question being attacked. It is a brilliant strategy and demonstrates just how prepared the mainstream paradigm managers are in their efforts to keep members of society locked inside the box when it comes to certain subjects.

Regardless of the number of “peer-reviewed” research pieces being copy and pasted on this website or any other alternative news productions, it is important for readers to realize that a lot of scientific research is flawed and does not accurately represent the truth about the questions being examined.

There are tremendous amounts of bias in medical research due to the heavy influence that pharmaceutical companies have on institutions of higher learning and the federal government of the United States. This situation is fast becoming a serious problem for the scientific community as was reported in 2012 in an article published in the Washington Post.

According to another article written and published in The Atlantic magazine, “Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong.”

A publication put out by the University of California at Berkeley reported, “Almost 75% of U.S. clinical trials in medicine are paid for by private companies.” With statistics like these how can there ever be “peer-reviewed” research that is truly unbiased and representative of the truth regarding medicines and their effectiveness or ineffectiveness with regards to human subjects?

In the cases of Fluoride, Mercury, and vaccines, I have always found that it is probably better to rely on a little bit of common sense versus “peer-reviewed” research that often seems to defy the parameters of logic.

What do you think about this subject?

 

DISCLAIMER!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

The IABDM: Fluoride and Mercury Free Dentistry

15 Jun

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

I am including a link for readers that want access to professional dental services without the risks of being exposed to the toxic substances, Fluoride and Mercury.

Biological dentistry is concerned with the whole body effects of all dental materials, techniques and procedures.
It is fluoride-free, mercury-free and mercury-safe.

Please visit the IABDM (International Academy of Biological Dentistry & Medicine’s) website by clicking this link and become educated by the dental professionals that truly understand the serious dangers associated with Fluoride and Mercury.

Can Fluoridated Drinking Water Harm the Body?

14 Jun

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Tap water, from your local municipality, contains sodium fluoride or the chemical, hexafluorosilicic acid. The rationale for placing a fluoridating agent in public drinking water, according to most public health officials, is to lower the number of dental caries within the general population.

For many years, people have been arguing with local and state governments about whether fluoride, in drinking water, can harm the human body. In one corner, there are fluoride advocates pointing to the benefits of fluoridating water supplies. They claim people enjoy fewer cavities because local water companies add fluoride to their product at treatment facilities. In the other corner, outspoken individuals claim fluoride is a toxic substance that causes irreparable harm to human beings.

At the center of this controversy is an important question that proponents of fluoride refuse to address. Why are people being medicated without first having a proper medical evaluation? There are plenty of angry citizens objecting to the outrageous policy of mass medicating the general population.

According to the National Toxicology Program, Fluoride can cause genetic damage and cancer in humans. There is also strong evidence that Fluoride can have damaging effects to the brain. (Chioca LR, et al. (2007). European Journal of Pharmacology Oct 25; [Epub]

But you don’t have to be a medical researcher to know that fluoride is a serious poison. Just pick up a tube of common tooth paste and read the warning message printed on the back of the product. It reads something like this: “WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidental­ly swallow more than used for brushing, seek profession­al help or contact a poison control center immediatel­y.”

Perhaps the majority of people in the United States have been exposed to fluoride for so long that they have permanent brain damage and are incapable of fighting local, state, and federal governments on this most important health issue.

Please take the time to learn more about this poison and how it is directly affecting you and your loved ones every time you drink a glass of water, take a shower, and eat foods that have been cooked or washed in water.

AMA Endorses the Elimination of Religious Exemptions Regarding Vaccinations

11 Jun

By Dr. John L Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

According to an article in the publication, Newsweek, the AMA (American Medical Association) has recently endorsed a new policy that has the goal of eliminating religious exemptions regarding vaccinations for healthcare consumers in the United States. Although the AMA is not a government agency that can write actual laws, it has tremendous influence and lobbying power over state and other legislative bodies that ultimately determine healthcare laws in America.

This is a very aggressive policy change by the AMA that could spell the end of healthcare consumers’ rights to choose if and when they submit to a particular vaccine at a given time during their lives.

Currently, many states have laws that allow citizens to choose whether or not they receive medical vaccines. Religious and philosophical exemptions are regularly used by anti-vaccine groups in order to opt out of the regularly published vaccine guidelines that are followed by the large majority of people throughout the country.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these potentially harmful drugs might do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because less than 200 people in the entire United States were infected by measles in 2014. The Measles outbreak in Disneyland has been cited by the AMA as one of the reasons they have revised their policy and want to bring an end to religious exemptions regarding vaccinations.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (1)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (2)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

Regardless of a person’s feelings about the benefits or dangers associated with vaccinations, it is the opinion of this writer that every human being should have the right to choose if he or she wants to be exposed to a particular medicine.

What do you think about this subject?

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers